Brief Summary of the Case Studies

Three Case Studies

Collective Leadership and Individual Transformation


The seven values and 30 underpinning behaviours emerged from a literature review of leadership and qualitative research undertaken across various projects. This formed the basis of the early Collective Leadership Inventory (CLI). The CLI was tested in two programmes of executive education and a large research project. The first programme was a series of cohorts on a Metropolitant Local Authority Middle Management Executive Education programme over a two year period. The second programme was a programme commissioned by the government office to test out new hallmark partnership values and behaviours within a Community Safety Partnership working across a City Region.

Metropolitan Local Authority



Background

The initial research was tested during a strategic level leadership development programme. The programme was led by Dr Nick Clifford of Manchester Business School and Dr Stephen Brookes led the session on leadership.

Overall Aim of the Programme

The aim of the programme was to support the large Metropolitan Authority in a large-scale transformative change programme which was seeking to change the culture of the organisation to one which supported lean processes but enhanced collaborative and engaged leadership. It provided a rich balance of leadership and management input supported by applied learning through action-based trio groups who reported back to Senior Leaders, facilitated by the Programme Director



Who was the target audience?

This programme ran for a number of years and was focused on a number of different cohorts of leaders within the Metropolitan Local Authority. For the purposes of the CLI, six cohorts took part in the research which formed the basis of pre-session surveys which then informed the practical elements of the leadership session facilitated by the session leader. Two earlier cohorts completed a TRANSFORM survey which is an individual-focused instrument. This was then accompanied by the first version of CLI for the remaining six cohorts during the two-year period.

Brief Analysis

A full analysis of this (and other surveys) is described in the Selfless Leader (Brookes 2016). This Local Authority CLI is the most substantial survey. The overall results, per cohort, are illustrated above. Clear patterns emerged across all six cohorts. First, there was a clear commitment to a collective vision and partnership working but less so in terms of the remaining six values and underpinning behaviours. The focus on outcomes and the development of skills and behaviours were consistently poorly perceived.

.

Transformational Leadership Inventory (TLI

The Transformational Leadership Inventory (TLI) outlines partcipants self-perception on their own transformational leadership skills. In relation to the TRANSFORM leadership inventory, this also included a private sector programme. For the Metropolitan Local Authority participants, the TRANSFORM individual survey was completed at the same time as the CLI. This was also a pre-session task the results of which informed some of the practical sessions and debates.

The TLI showed a major weakness in relation to the setting of clear goals with one exception (figure 2).

Transformational Leadership Inventory Results for Local Authority

The opportunity was also taken to use the TRANSFORM survey in a similar manner with a private sector company executive education programme. The trends, as illustrated in figure 2, were remarkably similar.

The TLI is discussed further in the Leadership Quomodo web-chapter. In this illustration, we can see a number of individual leadership gaps which will impact on the collective leadership behaviours. For example, the ‘setting of goals’ and ‘relinquish control and empower’ are not highly rated, trends which were evident in all instances of the TLI. The gaps in terms of 'setting clear goals' resulted in this being included as a collective leadership value in the final version of the CLI.

Community Safety Partnership Development Programme



Overall Aims of the Programme

“The aim of the programme was to develop and enhance the existing leadership capabilities within the Crime and Disorder Partnerships in a Large Metropolitan Police Force area. The CLI was completed as part of the pre-session tasks. The results were applied to practical learning sessions during the two days of each of the two cohort programmes.

The content focused primarily on Empowered and Effective leadership, Commissioning, Evaluation and Interpretation, Community Engagement and how community safety can be considered in all policy making). The programme addressed keys skills that had been identified for working across public partnerships and focused on both organisational and individual levels, prioritising the need for working across networks.



Who was the target audience?

The programme was targeted at Senior Managers/Leaders from public authorities (50 delegates across two cohorts each of two days duration)

Brief Analysis

Familiar patterns are evident although perceptions were much stronger across this partnership grouping. Different partnership members worked together in these two cohorts. The strongest value in terms of participant perception was the extent to which the partnership engaged with the public, particularly within their respective teams. There was also a positive response in terms of sharing resources. Areas for further development included public perception measures and the building of skills and behaviours.

Transformational Leadership Inventory (TLI

The transformational leadership survey showed very similar patterns to the local authority and private sector company in that leaders did not set clear goals nor empower. These gaps were discussed during the sessions and were recognised by participants. The discussions alongside the findings were instrumental in informing a further revision of the CLI which has now been adopted within this website.


Transformational Leadership Inventory Results for Community Safety Partnership

The TLI is discussed further in the Leadership Quomodo web-chapter.

Health Inequalities Partnership



Who was the research aimed at?

The Collective Leadership Inventory was completed by Local Strategic Partnership members/executives, non-executive directors and public and community representatives engaged in tackling inequalities in health in this Merseyside local authority area. The research was funded by the North West Improvement Network (NWIN).

What is collective leadership? Our briefing to respondents

For our work with you, your organization and your partners, we are looking at public leadership. By referring to ‘public leadership’, we do not view this - as most people do – as belonging to ‘an individual’ but rather as something that belongs to many individuals who collectively focus on achieving public good – whether this is improved health, safety, education or jobs. In the case of our work in Merseyside the focus is on looking at the role of collective leadership and partnership working in tackling inequalities in health.



Brief Analysis

Most felt that partners were aligning priorities with the collective vision in tackling health inequalities. More needs to be done to engage with the public and other partners, align skills and behaviours to the overall vision and in sharing of resources, information and intelligence. In terms of outcomes, improvements in evidence-based assessment, joint monitoring and problem solving are required. Governance, innovation and stakeholder legitimacy were considered for improvement along with a commitment to continuous improvement. Perceptions on the legitimacy perceived by stakeholders varied between the executives, non-executives and elected members (who were generally positive) and community and public representatives who perceived this quite negatively.

You can look at a very brief illustration of the differences between the different levels of the CLI (Executives, Non Executives and Community/Public Representatives)

CLICK HERE.